Sharipova L.

Polonisation and all that, or religious identity and cultural change in Ruthenia: the Union of Lublin and the myths of "polonisation"

Section: Studies in Special Historical Disciplines

Abstract: The article presents a review of an obsolete historiographic statement saying that an ultimate aftermath of the Union of Lublin signed in Poland in 1569, which caused the incorporation of Ukrainian lands of Grand Duchy of Lithuania to the Kingdom of Poland, was the forced polonisation of Orthodox people. As way of replacement for this oversimplified scheme, grounded on Ukrainian populist historiography of the 19th ct., complemented with the elements of Polish nationalistic and Russian imperial historiographic traditions, the author presents a new model, based on an assimilation formula. According to the formula, Orthodox szlachta people conversion to Protestantism and later to Catholicism initiated their loss of self-identification with Ukraine-Ruthenia cultural space. The process intensified as the Orthodox Church lost its legitimate status after the Church Union of Brest of 1596 and finished with an ultimate merger of this social group with the Polish Catholic elite in the early 17th century

Keywords: historiography, Union of Lublin of 1569, Church Union of Brest of 1596, polonisation, religious conversion, self-identification

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.20.366     Citation

• Sharipova L. (University of Nottingham)

Cite:
Sharipova L. (2016). Polonisation and all that, or religious identity and cultural change in Ruthenia: the Union of Lublin and the myths of "polonisation". Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (20) 366-377. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.20.366

References:

1. Hrushevskyi, M. (2012). Istoriia Ukrainy-Rusy [History of Ukrainy-Rus]. Vol. 6. Zhytie ekonomichne, kulturne, natsionalne 14–17 vikiv [Economic, cultural, and national life in the 14–17th centuries (p. 206). Alberta, Toronto. [In Ukrainian].
2. Hrushevskyi, M. (2012). Istoriia Ukrainy-Rusy [History of Ukrainy-Rus]. Vol. 6. Zhytie ekonomichne, kulturne, natsionalne 14–17 vikiv [Economic, cultural, and national life in the 14–17th centuries (p. 219). Alberta, Toronto. [In Ukrainian].
3. On the adoption of Polish administrative, legal and social models in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania since 1386, see Sysyn, F. E. (1982). Regionalism and political thought in seventeenth-century Ukraine: the nobility’s grievances at the diet of 1641. In Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 6, 2, p. 169. [In English].
4. Hrushevskyi, M. (2012). Istoriia Ukrainy-Rusy [History of Ukrainy-Rus]. Vol. 6. Zhytie ekonomichne, kulturne, natsionalne 14–17 vikiv [Economic, cultural, and national life in the 14–17th centuries (p. 190). Alberta, Toronto. [In Ukrainian].
5. Lewitter, L. R. (1948). Poland, the Ukraine and Russia. In The Slavonic (and East European) Review, 27, p. 169. [In English].
6. Subtelny, O. (2005). Ukraine: a history (4th ed., pp. 94–95). Toronto. [In English].
7. Sysyn, F. E. (1985). Between Poland and the Ukraine. The dilemma of Adam Kysil, 1600–1653 (pp. 19, 21). Cambridge, MA. [In English].
8. Magocsi, P. R. (1996). A history of Ukraine (p. 149). Toronto. [In English].
9. Yakovenko, N. (2010). A “portrait” and “self-portrait” of the borderlands: the cultural and geographic image of “Ukraine” in the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. In O. A. Andriewsky, Z. E. Kohut, S. Plokhy, and L. Wolff, Eds., Tentorium honorum: essays presented to Frank E. Sysyn on his sixtieth birthday (p. 499). Toronto. [In English].
10. Odnorozhenko, O. (2012). Ukrainska ruska elita doby serednovichchia i rannoho modernu: struktura ta vlada [Ukrainian Russian elite of Middle Ages and Early Modern Times: structure and government] (pp. 251–253). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
11. Head, R. H. (2008). Jenatsch’s axe: social boundaries, identity, and myth in the era of the Thirty Years’ War (pp. 34–35). Rochester, NY. [In English]; how the same principle applied to Ruthenia is discussed in Sysyn, F. E. (1982). Regionalism and Political Thought in Seventeenth-Century Ukraine: The Nobility’s Grievances at the Diet of 1641. In Harvard Ukrainian Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 171–172. [In English].
12. Yakovenko, N. (1993). Zdobutky i vtraty Liublinskoi unii [Achievements and losses of Lublin Union]. In Kyivska starovyna [Kyiv antiquity], 3, p. 82. [In Uktrainian]. This parallel between the Union of Lublin and cultural change in the Ukrainian lands reemerges in her later work: Yakovenko, N. (2002). Topos “ziednanykh narodiv” u panehirykakh kniaziam Ostrozkym i Zaslavskym (bilia vytokiv ukrainskoi identychnosti) [Topos of “connected nations” in the panegyrics to Ostrogski and Zasławski princes (origins of Ukrainian identity)]. In Paralelnyi svit: doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI–XVII st. [Parallel world: studies of the history of conceptions and ideas in Ukraine in the 16–17th centuries] (p. 243). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
13. Yakovenko, N. (1993). Zdobutky i vtraty Liublinskoi unii [Achievements and losses of Lublin Union]. In Kyivska starovyna [Kyiv antiquity], 3, pp. 83–84. [In Ukrainian].
14. Kaminskyi, A. S. (2011). Istoriia Rechi pospolytoi yak istoriia bahatokh narodiv, 1505–1795. Hromadiany, ikhnia derzhava, suspilstvo, kultura [History of Rzeczpospolita as the history of multiple nations. 1505–1795. Citizens, their state, society and culture] (p. 63). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
15. Sysyn, F. E. (1985). Between Poland and the Ukraine. The dilemma of Adam Kysil,1600–1653 (p. 35). Cambridge, MA. [In English].
16. Yakovenko, N. (2002). Polsha i poliaky u shkilnykh pidruchnykakh istorii, abo vidlunnia dalekoho i blyzkoho mynuloho [Poland and Polish people in school history workbooks or the echo of far and near past]. In Paralelnyi svit: doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI–XVII st. [Parallel world: studies of the history of conceptions and ideas in Ukraine in the 16–17th centuries] (p. 369). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
17. See Sharipova, L. (2015). Orthodox reform in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.In H. Louthan, G. Murdock, Eds., A Companion to the Reformation in Central Europe (pp. 223–253, Brill’s companions to the Christian tradition, 61). Leiden, Boston. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004301627_011
18. Levitckii, O. (1882). Sotcinianstvo v Polshe i Iugo-Zapadnoi Rusi [Socinianism in Poland and South-West Rus]. In Kievskaia starina [Kyiv antiquity], 2, p. 29. [In Russian].
19. Yakovenko, N. (2002). Relihiini konversii: sproba pohliadu zseredyny [Religious conversions: an attempt to look from the inside]. In Paralelnyi svit: doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI–XVII st. [Parallel world: studies of the history of conceptions and ideas in Ukraine in the 16–17th centuries] (p. 33). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
20. Levitckii, O. (1882). Sotcinianstvo v Polshe i Iugo-Zapadnoi Rusi [Socinianism in Poland and South-West Rus]. In Kievskaia starina [Kyiv antiquity], 2, p. 56. [In Russian].
21. Crăciun, M. (1997). Protestantism and Orthodoxy in 16th-Century Moldavia. In K. Maag, Ed., The Reformation in Eastern and Central Europe (p. 133). Aldershot. [In English]; Dmitriev, M. (2007). Western Christianity and Eastern Orthodoxy. In Po-Chia Hsia, R., Ed., Reform and Expansion, 1500–1660 (pp. 333– 334, The Cambridge History of Christianity, 6). Cambridge. [In English].
22. Williams, G. (1978). Protestants in the Ukraine during the Period of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. In Harvard Ukrainian Studies, 2, p. 42. [In English].
23. By 1649 only twelve seats were held by secular Protestant and Orthodox senators: Yakovenko, N. (2002). Relihiini konversii: sproba pohliadu zseredyny [Religious conversions: an attempt to look from the inside]. In Paralelnyi svit: doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI–XVII st. [Parallel world: studies of the history of conceptions and ideas in Ukraine in the 16–17th centuries] (p. 34). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
24. Pamiatniki polemicheskoi literatury v Zapadnoi Rusi [Polemic literature memorials in Western Europe] (Vol. 3, pp. 213–114, Russkaia istoricheskaia biblioteka [Russian historical library], 19). (1903). Saint Petersburg. [In Russian].
25. See Levitckii, O. (1883). Predislovie [Preface]. In Arkhiv Iugo-Zapadnoi Rossii [Archive of South-West Russia], Pt. 1, Vol. 4, pp. 48–49. Kyiv. [In Russian]; Dovbyshchenko, M. V. (2008). Volynska shliakhta u relihiinykh rukhakh kintsia XVI–pershoi polovyny XVII st. [Noble people of Volyn in religious movements of the late 16th – first half of the 17th centuries] (pp. 465–466). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
26. See Yakovenko, N. (2002). Relihiini konversii: sproba pohliadu zseredyny [Religious conversions: an attempt to look from the inside]. In Paralelnyi svit: doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI–XVII st. [Parallel world: studies of the history of conceptions and ideas in Ukraine in the 16–17th centuries] (pp. 38–39). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
27. See Jobert, A. (1974). De Luther à Mohila: la Pologne dans la crise de la Chrétienté, 1517–1648 (p. 322). Paris. [In French].
28. Gudziak, B. (1998). Crisis and reform: the Kyivan Metropolitanate, the Patriarchate of Constantinople, and the genesis of the Union of Brest. Cambridge, MA. [In English].
29. Princess Anna Koretska-Khodkevychivna (†1626) converted to Calvinism before moving on to Antitrinitarianism and some form of “Judaising”: Fond 312, Unit 60 (367), Folio 10 re. Institute of Manuscript, V. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine. [In Ukrainian]; also Arkhiv Iugo-Zapadnoi Rossii [Archive of South-West Russia], Pt. 1, Vol. 7, p. 66. (1887). Kyiv. [In Russian]; Yakovenko, N. (2011). “Pogreb tilu moiemu vybyraiu s predky moiemy”: mistsia pokhovan volynskykh kniaziv [“I choose my grave to be where my ancestors are buried”: burial places of Volyn princes]. In Ukraina: kulturna spadshchyna, natsionalna svidomist, derzhavnist [Ukraine: cultural heritage, national conscience and sovereignty], pp. 784–808. Lviv. [In Ukrainian]; Yakovenko, N. (2012). Dzerkala identychnosti: doslidzhennia z istorii uiavlen ta idei v Ukraini XVI – pochatku XVIII stolittia [Mirrors of identity: studies of the history of conceptions and ideas in Ukraine in the 16th – early 18th centuries] (pp. 114–115.). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].

Dubrovina Lyubov, Gestwa Klaus

Return from Germany to Ukraine of the "Sofian Charter" of Peter the Great on the Metropolitan Appointment of Ioasaph Krokovskyi in 1708: Ukrainian-German History of the Original Charter and Prospects for Restitution of Cultural Valuables

Abstract: The goal of the article is to cover the ceremony and the German-Ukrainian scientific colloquium dedicated to the return from Germany to Ukraine of the Charter of tsar Peter the Great, on the appointment of Metropolitan Joasaph Krokovskyi in 1708. The Charter was taken from the fоnds of the V. I. Vernadskyi Library during World War II and ended up at the Institute of East European History and Local History of Tubingen University. The colloquium was attended by German and Ukrainian scientists. Natalia Sinkevich revealed the historical significance of the Charter, the history of the Charter and the personality of Metropolitan Joasaph Krokovskyi himself. Tetyana Cebta traced the history of the Charter to 1941 and proved her belonging to the collection of St. Sophia Cathedral, stored at the Institute of Manuscript of the V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine. Korinna Kur-Korolev investigated the circumstances of the export of Charters from the library during the Second World War according to the documents of the German archives; Katarina Kucher revealed the history of the Charter at the Institute of East European History and Local History of Tubingen University and the work of experts on the return of the diploma. Wolfgang Eichwede shared the experience of transferring another Charter of the St. Sophia collection, issued by Peter the Great in 1700 to Metropolitan Varlaam Yasynskyi, together with the director of the Goethe Institute Kyiv branch, Countess Ute Baudissin, the return of the painting by Hans von Mare from Kyiv to Bremen. Halyna Kovalchuk, Olga Stepchenko (Kyiv) brought attention to the history of the formation of the collection in St. Sophia Cathedral, disclosed the contents of the unique book and manuscript collection stored in the V. I. Vernadskyi Library. Klaus Gestwa and Lyubov Dubrovina discussed the results of the research of the Charter. The Return of the Charter is an example of fruitful scientific cooperation between scientists from Germany and Ukraine, an effective solution to the issue of the return of expropriated cultural values. The location of many expropriated materials remains unknown today. Therefore, it is important to develop international cultural and scientific cooperation, and the creationof the State Registry of Lost Cultural Property.

Keywords: St. Sophia Charter of Peter the Great, displacement of cultural property, World War II, Institute of East European History and Local History of Tubingen University,V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.24.329     Citation

• Dubrovina Lyubov (V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv, dubrovina@nbuv.gov.ua) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1011-7910
• Gestwa Klaus (Institute for East European Studies and Local Lore of the University of Tübingen (Germany), klaus.gestwa@uni-tuebingen.de)

Cite:
Dubrovina Lyubov (2019). Return from Germany to Ukraine of the "Sofian Charter" of Peter the Great on the Metropolitan Appointment of Ioasaph Krokovskyi in 1708: Ukrainian-German History of the Original Charter and Prospects for Restitution of Cultural Valuables. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (24) 329-342. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.24.329

References:

1. Povernennia v Ukrainu hramoty Petra I Ioasafu Krokovskomu 1708 r.: materialy urochystoho peredannia Hramoty ta ukrainsko-nimetskoho kolokviumu 30 travnia 2019 r. z istorii unikalnoho dokumenta Sofiiskoi kolektsii [The returning to Ukraine of the Peter the First Charter to Joasaph Krokovskyi, 1708: Materials of the solemn transfer of the Charter and Ukrainian-German colloquium on May 30, 2019, on the history of the unique dokument from St. Sophia collection]. (2019). L. Dubrovina, T. Arseienko, Z. Sharikova (Comps.). [In Ukrainian].
2. Kur-Korolev, K., Kukher, K., Sinkevych, N., Sebta, T. Trofei viiny: istoriia vyvezenoi z Kyieva hramoty Petra I ta nimetski studii Sxidnoi Yevropy do I pislia 1945 r. [Tropheis of war: a history of the Peter the First Charter exported from Kyiv and German Sudies on the East Europe before and after 1945]. (2017). In Bibliotechnyi visnyk [Library Bulletin]. No. 1.
3. Bolkhovitinov, Ye. Opisanie Kievo-Sofiiskogo sobora i Kievskoi yerarkhii [Description of the Kyiv St. Sophia Cathedral and Kyiv episcopy]. (1825). Part 2. Kyiv. [In Russian].
4. Dubrovina, L. A., Onyshchenko, O. S. Istoriia Natsionalnoi biblioteky Ukrainy imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. 1941–1964 [History of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine. 1941–1964]. (2003). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
5. Dubrovina, L. A., Onyshchenko, O. S. Istoriia Natsionalnoi biblioteky Ukrainy imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. 1918–1941 [History of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine. 1918–1941].(1998). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
6. Barvinok, V, I, Zahalnyi ohliad starodrukiv kyivskykh bibliotek [General review of the early printed book in Kyiv libraries]. (1924). In Bibliolohichni visti [Bibliological news]. Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].
7. Hnatenko, L. Zibrannia rukopysnykh knyh ta arkhiv Sofiiskoho soboru [Collection of manuscripts and archives of the St. Sophia Cathedral]. (2015). In Arkhivy, kolektsii ta zibrannia derzhavnykh, hromadskykh ta relihiinykh ustanov u fondakh Instytutu rukopysu Natsionalnoi Biblioteky Ukrainy imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Putivnyk [Archives and collections of the state, public and religious institutions in the fonds of Institute of Manuscript of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine. Fonds’ Guide]. Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].

Dobrovolska Viktoriya, Kalinina-Symonchuk Yuliya

Criteria and priorities for selecting objects of historical and cultural documentary heritage for digitization

Section: Information Resource of Cultural Heritage

Abstract: The purpose of this work is to identify and generalize the criteria for selecting historical and cultural documentary heritage objects for digitization and further preservation and providing access for users. The research methodology consists of applying general scientific and special methods, in particular, the system approach, analysis, synthesis, logical method, and visualization of research results. The scientific novelty of the work lies in identifying different approaches and a developed system of criteria and priorities, generalizing these criteria for selecting historical and cultural documentary heritage objects for digitization and the conditions to be taken into account, as well as the need for a coordinated position of various departments in this direction, attracting official expertise to determine the sequence and priorities to avoid duplication of digitization. Conclusions. The selection of objects of historical and cultural documentary heritage for digitization is a task that must maintain a balance between the national significance of the funds for the history of national states and the history of mankind, the user's requests and the task of preserving the funds. Digitization offers significant benefits to users of digital cultural resources. The main criteria for selecting objects for digitization are: value, uniqueness, and rarity of documents; documents related to objects of national heritage; documents that have research value; and documents that have an unsatisfactory physical condition; documents that threaten to lose information; documents in high demand and publications that are available in limited quantities. The main goal of selecting cultural heritage objects for digitization is to promote the establishment of Ukrainian identity, the introduction of digital objects of national memory of Ukraine and world heritage into a wide social circulation, and the integration of various Ukrainian digital cultural information resources into a single information system.

Keywords: objects of historical and cultural documentary heritage, digitization, digital resources, preservation of cultural heritage.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.25.310     Citation

• Dobrovolska Viktoriya, vika_dobrovolska@ukr.net ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-1179
• Kalinina-Symonchuk Yuliya, kcyuliya@gmail.com ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-2926

Cite:
Dobrovolska Viktoriya (2020). Criteria and priorities for selecting objects of historical and cultural documentary heritage for digitization. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (25) 310-323. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.25.310

References:

1. Avtorske pravo dlia bibliotekariv [Copyright law for librarians] / O. Vasyliev (Trans.). Kyiv : TOV «IMM «FRAKSIM», 2015. [In Ukrainian].
2. Dubrovina L. A. Biblioteky v systemi instytutsii natsionalnoi pamiati Ukrainy, natsionalnoi kulturnoi spadshchyny ta ii dzherelnoho resursu [Libraries within the system of institutions of national historical memory of Ukraine, cultural heritage and databases]. Rukopysna ta knyzhkova spadshchyna Ukrainy [Manuscript and Book Heritage of Ukraine]. Kyiv, 2016, iss. 20, pp. 233–251. [In Ukrainian].
3. Dubrovina L. A. Knyzhkovi ta rukopysni fondy bibliotek – kulturna spadshchyna ta dzherelna baza vyvchennia spilnoho istorychnoho mynuloho ta mizhrehionalnoi intehratsii v epokhu tsyfrovoho suspilstva [Book and manuscript collections of libraries as cultural heritage and the database for historical studies of the mutual past and regional integration in the era of digital society]. Kyiv, 2018. [In Ukrainian].
4. Evstigneeva G.A. O kriteriiakh komplektovaniia traditsionnogo bibliotechnogo fonda i fonda elektronnykh publikacii v edinoi sisteme formirovaniia bibliotechno-informatsionnogo fonda biblioteki na primere Gosudarsnvennoi publichnoi nauchno-tekhnicheskoi biblioteki Rossii [On the criteria for the acquisition of a traditional library fond and a fond of electronic publications in a single system for the formation of a library-information fond of a library by the example of the Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology]. Nauchnye i tehnicheskie biblioteki [Science and technology libraries], 2010, No. 10, pp. 23–29. [In Russian].
5. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro natsionalnu kulturnu spadshchynu” [Law of Ukraine on Protection of Cultural Heritage], 2000. [In Ukrainian].
6. Kalinina-Symonchuk Yu. S. Ekspertyza tsinnosti rukopysnoi ta knyzhkovoi spadshchyny v zakonodavstvi Ukrainy: suchasnyi stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Examination of the value of manuscript and book heritage in the legislation of Ukraine: current state and prospects of development.] Rukopysna ta knyzhkova spadshchyna Ukrainy [Manuscript and Book Heritage of Ukraine], 2019, iss., 24, pp. 268–280. [In Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.24.268
7. Kovalchuk H. Ekspertyza knyzhkovykh pamiatok u bibliotekakh: ukrainoznavchyi aspect [Expertise of books in library: Ukrainian Studies aspect]. Ukraina: kulturna spadshchyna, natsionalna svidomist, derzhavnist [Ukraine: cultural heritage, national consiousness, the concept of state], 2012, No. 21, pp. 403–416. [In Ukrainian].
8. Kovalchuk H. I. Kryterii vidboru knyzhkovykh pamiatok dlia pershocherhovoho potsyfruvannia [Criteria for selecting book memorabilia for priority digitization]. Naukovì pracì Natsìonalnoï bìblìoteky Ukrainy ìmenì V. Ì. Vernadskoho [Scientifik Works of the V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine], 2010, iss. 28, pp. 141–147. [In Ukrainian].
9. Kovalchuk H. and Lobuzina K. Problemy stvorennia intehrovanoho veb-resursu knyzhkovykh pamiatok Ukrainy [Problems of creation of an integrated web resource of book monuments of Ukraine]. Materialy 3-kh Mizhnarodnykh bibliohrafichnykh chytan “Starodruky i ridkisni vydannia v universytetskii bibliotetsi” (Odesa, 15–17 veresnia, 2015) [Proceedings of the 3rd International Bibliographic Readings "Old Printing Books and Rare Editions in the University Library" (Odessa, September 15–17, 2015)], 2016, pp. 8–17. [In Ukrainian].
10. Kovalchuk H. Ridkisni ukrainski knyhy v bibliotechnykh fondakh: pamiatkoznavchyi aspekt [Rare Ukrainian books in library collections: monumental aspect]. Bibliotechnyi Visnyk [Library Bulletin], 2007, No. 5, pp. 29–36. [In Ukrainian].
11. Lobuzin I. Tsyfrovi bibliotechni proekty: tekhnolohichni rishennia ta upravlinnia zhyttievym tsyklom kolektsii [Digital library projects: technological solutions and life cycle management of collections]. Kyiv, 2016. [In Ukrainian].
12. Lobuzina K. Informatsiini tekhnolohii stvorennia natsionalnykh bibliohrafichnykh resursiv [Information technologies of the creation of national bibliographic resources]. Bibliotechnyi Visnyk [Library Bulletin], 2013, No. 1, pp. 9–14. [In Ukrainian].
13. Losiievskyi I. Ya. Dokumentalni pamiatky v bibliotechnykh zibranniakh: teoretyko-metodolohichni aspekty ta suchasna praktyka [Documentary monuments in library collections: theoretical and methodological aspects and modern practice]. Visnyk Kharkivskoi akademii kultury [Bulletin of the Kharkiv State Academy of Culture], 2013, iss., 41, pp. 124–134. [In Ukrainian].
14. Metodyka i kryterii vyiavlennia i vkliuchennia unikalnykh dokumentalnykh pamiatok Natsionalnoho arkhivnoho fondu Ukrainy do Derzhavnoho reiestru natsionalnoho kulturnoho nadbannia [Methods and criteria for identifying and including unique documentary monuments of the National Archival Fund of Ukraine in the State Register of National Cultural Heritage]. Kyiv, 1998. [In Ukrainian].
15. Metodychni rekomendatsii dlia Derzhavnoi reiestratsii knyzhkovykh pamiatok Ukrainy. Kyrylychni rukopysni knyhy ta starodruky. Pryntsypy reiestratsiinoho opysu [Methodical recommendations for the State registration of books in Ukraine. Cyrillic handwritten books and early printed books. Principles of the registration inventory] / L. A. Dubrovina and alia. (Comps.). Kyiv, 2007. [In Ukrainian].
16. Mizhderzhavnyi standart: DSTU: DOST 7.87.2008 Systema standartiv z informatsii, bibliotechnoi ta vydavnychoi spravy. Knyzhkovi pamiatky. Zahalni vymohy [International Standart: DSTU: DOST 7.87.2008 The Standart system on informatics, bibliology and publishing. The books heritage. General requirements]. [In Ukrainian].
17. Poriadok zanesennia unikalnykh pamiatok Muzeinoho fondu Ukrainy do Derzhavnoho reiestru natsionalnoho kulturnoho nadbannia. Nakaz MON Ukrainy. [The procedure for entering unique monuments of the Museum Fund of Ukraine in the State Register of National Cultural Heritage. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine], 2002. [In Ukrainian].
18. Pro zatverdzhennia Poriadku vidboru rukopysnykh knyh, ridkisnykh i tsinnykh vydan do Derzhavnoho reiestru natsionalnoho kulturnoho nadbannia [On approval of the Procedure for selection of manuscripts, rare and valuable publications to the State Register of National Cultural Heritage], 2016, paragraph 437, section II, articles 1–3. [In Ukrainian].
19. Rybachok O. M. Mizhnarodni intehrovani tsyfrovi resursy dokumentalnoi spadshchyny arkhiviv, bibliotek, muzeiv: etapy stvorennia, stratehii rozvytku (80-ti roky XX – 10-ti roky XXI st.) [International integrated digital resources of documentary heritage of archives, libraries, museums: stages of creation, development strategies (80s years of the 20 – 10th years of the 21 century)]. Candidate’s thesis. Kyiv, 2018. [In Ukrainian].
20. Ukrainskyi bibliohrafichnyi repertuar. Ukrainska bibliotechna entsyklopediia [Ukrainian bibliographic repertoire. Ukrainian library encyclopedia]. [In Ukrainian].
21. Dobrovolska Viktoriya (2019). Preservation of the digital cultural heritage: basic problems, tasks, principles of selection. Social and Human Sciences. Polish-Ukrainian scientific journal, 2019, 03 (23). [In English].
22. Europeana content strategy: Getting the right content to the right user at the right time. 2017. [In English].
23. Guidelines for digitization projects for collections and holdings in the public domain, particularly those held by libraries and archives. IFLA ; UNESCO. 2003. [In English].
24. Guidelines for National Bibliographies in the Electronic Age. IFLA. 2008. [In English].
25. Hyvönen E. Publishing and Using Cultural Heritage Linked Data on the Semantic WebPublishing and Using. Synthesis lectures on the semantic web: theory and technology, 2012, No. 3, pp. 1–145. [In English]. doi: https://doi.org/10.2200/S00452ED1V01Y201210WBE003
26. Johansson S. Who has the power over cultural heritage? A case study of digitization selection criteria used at Kungl. Biblioteket. Master’s thesis Swedish school of library and information science. 2014, 70 p. [In English].
27. Peter B. Hirtle, Emily Hudson, and Andrew T. Kenyon. Copyright and Cultural Institutions Guidelines for Digitization for U.S. Libraries, Archives, and Museums. Cornell University Library, Ithaca, New York, 2009. [In English].
28. Nacionalni projekt «Hrvatska kulturna baština» 2007. Smjernice za odabir građe zadigitalizaciju. [In Serbo Croatian].
29. Ooghe B. and Dries M. Analysing Selection for Digitisation: Current Practices and Common Incentives. D-Lib Magazine, 2015, No. 9/10. [In English].
30. Terras M. Digital Images for the Information Professional. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008, 245 p. [In English].

Kashevarova Nataliia

Documents of the Main Office for Science of the Rosenberg Office as Sources on the Ideological Component of Nazi Policy in the Occupied Territory of Eastern Europe during World War II

Abstract: The purpose of the research is to characterize the documents of the Main Office for Science (German: Haupamt Wissenschaft) by the Commissioner of the Fuehrer for the Supervision of the Entire Intellectual and Ideo-logical Schooling and Training of the NSDAP (German: Beauftragter des Führers für die Überwachung der gesamten geistigen und weltanschaulichen Schulung und Erziehung der NSDAP, and related materials of A. Rosenberg’s other structures as the sources on the ideological component of the Third Reich’s struggle against Bolshevism and their significance for information or ideological component of the Nazi occupation policy in the occupied territo-ries of Eastern Europe. The research methodology consists of historical-archival, historical-comparative research methods, source analysis methods. The scientific novelty is determined by the fact that the materials of the Rosenberg Office and the documents of the Main Office for Science, in particular, have not yet been the subject of a separate comprehensive scientific archival and source review for their possible use as the historical sources on the ideological component of Nazi policy, vision of connection between science and ideology, participation of the Main Office for Science in the so-called «ideological struggle» against Bolshevism, collection of scientific informa-tion in the occupied territories of Eastern Europe, in particular, the USSR. Although these documents are familiar to German researchers, the latter used them as the sources to determine the Rosenberg Office›s place in the NSDAP system and its significance for domestic party policy in the Third Reich. Conclusions. The analysis of the documents from the Main Office for Science of the Rosenberg Office allows us to conclude that a number of his documents for 1942–1945, as well as related documents of the Special Staff Science (German: Sonderstab Wissenschaft), which represented the interests of the department at the Special Command Force of Reichsleiter Alfred Rosenberg orReichsleiter Rosenberg Taskforce (German: Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg), contain the interesting and valuable information not only on the connection between National Socialist ideology and science but also on the collection and processing of various information about the state of science in the Soviet Union, especially the materials of scientific content, consolidated data about state of Soviet scientific institutions during the Nazi occupation, etc. This information has so far been little known or not introduced into scientific circulation at all, but it may be useful to researchers of the history of World War II.

Keywords: World War II, Main Office for Science by the Commissioner of the Fuehrer for the Supervision of the Entire Intellectual and Ideological Schooling and Training of the NSDAP, Special Staff Science, Reichsleiter Rosenberg Taskforce, ideology, propaganda, Bolshevism.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.26.239     Citation

• Kashevarova Nataliia (Institute of History of Ukraine, of National Аcademy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine), nataliya.kashevarova@gmail.com) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-0440

Cite:
Kashevarova Nataliia (2020). Documents of the Main Office for Science of the Rosenberg Office as Sources on the Ideological Component of Nazi Policy in the Occupied Territory of Eastern Europe during World War II. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (26) 239-257. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.26.239

References:

1. Bollmus R. Das Amt Rosenberg und seine Gegner: Studien zum Machtkampf im nationalsozialistischen Herrschaftssystem. München:R. Oldenburg Verlag, 2006. [In German]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486595543
2. Zellhuber A. “Unsere Verwaltung treibt einer Katastrophe zu ...”. Das Reichsministerium für die besetzten Ostgebiete und die deutsche Besatzungsherrschaft in der Sowjetunion 1941–1945. München: Ernst Vögel Verlag, 2006. [In German].
3. Piper E. Alfred Rosenberg: Hitlers Chefideologe. München: Karl Blessing Verlag, 2005. [In German].
4. Cecil R. The Myth of the Master Race: Alfred Rosenberg and Nazi Ideology. New York: Dodd Mead and Company, 1973. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0084255900019045
5. Auf dem Wege zur “Alternativ-Universität”. Die “Hohe Schule” Alfred Rosenbergs und die “Wissenschaftsarbeit” der NSV in Marburg (1994) Klio und die Nationalsozialisten: Gesammelte Schriften zur Wissenschafts- undRezeptionsgeschichte Volker Losemann / herg Herausgegeben von Claudia Deglau, Patrick Reinard und Kai Ruffing Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2017, pp. 77–100. [In German]. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11qdvs0
6. Collins D. and Rothfeder H. The Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg and the Looting of Jewish and Masonic Libraries during World War II. The Journal of Library History (1974–1987), 1983. Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 21–36.
7. Cultural Plunder by the Einsatstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg.
8. Grimsted P. K. Reconstructing the record of nazi cultural plunder. A survey of the dispersed archives of the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg (ERR). Amsterdam: IISH, 2011.
9. Grimsted P. K. Trophies of war and empire: The archival heritage of Ukraine, World War II, and the international politics of restitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press for Ukrainian Research Institute, 2001.
10. Gutsul, N. (2013). Der Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg und seine Tatigkeit in der Ukraine (1941–1944). Inaugural-Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades ... Gießen. [In German].
11. Hartung U. Verschleppt und verschollen: eine Dokumentation deutscher, sowjetischer und amerikanischer Akten zum NS-Kunstraub in der Sowjetunion (1941–1948). Bremen: Edition Temmen, 2000. [In German].
12. Kashevarova N. H. Dialnist Operatyvnoho shtabu Rozenberga z vyvchennia natsystamy «skhidnoho prostoru» (1940–1945) [The ERR activities on the nazi Ostraum study (1940–1945)]. Pt. 1: Dzhereloznavche doslidzhennia [Source Study], Pt. 2: Dokumenty [Documents]. Kyiv: Instytut istorii Ukrainy, 2014. [In Ukrainian, in German].
13. Sebta T. Operatyvnyi shtab reikhsliaitera Rosenberga ta yoho bibliotechna diialnist v Ukraini: dzhereloznavchyi analiz. Biblioteky Kyieva u period natsystskoi okupatsii (1941–1943) (pp. 114–148). Kyiv, 2004. [In Ukrainian].
14. Zinich M. Pokhishchennye sokrovishcha: vyvoz natsystami rossijskikh kulturnykh tsennostej. Moskva: Izdat. tsentr In-ta ros. istorii RAN, 2003. [In Russian].
15. Bundesarchiv Berlin, NS 8/229. [In German].
16. Ibid., NS 8/228. [In German].
17. Ibid., NS 8/241. [In German].
18. Hauptampt Wissenschaft (Berlin) / Guide to the YIVO Archives.
19. Hauptamt Wissenschaft (RG 216) / The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum.
20. Kashevarova N. G., Maloletova N. I. (2006). Deiatelnost Operativnogo shtaba reikhsljaitera Rosenberga v okkupirovannoj Evrope v period Vtoroj myrovoj vojny: spravochnyk-ukazatel arkhivnykh dokumentov iz kievskykh sobranyj [Activities of the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg in occupied Europe] / NAN Ukrainy; Natsionalnaja biblioteka Ukrainy im. V.I.Vernadskoho [i dr.]. Kyiv: NBU ym. V. Y. Vernadskoho. [In Russian].
21. NS 8. Kanzlei Rosenberg / Bundesarchiv. [In German].
22. NS 15. Der Beauftragte des Führers für die Überwachung der gesamten geistigen und weltanschaulichen Schulung und Erziehung der NSDAP / Bundesarchiv. [In German].
23. NS 30. Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg NSDAP / Bundesarchiv. [In German].
24. Kollektsiia dokumentov Operativnogo shtaba reikhsliaitera Rosenberga [Records of the Einsatzstab Reichsleiter Rosenberg]. / Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi arkhiv vyshchykh orhaniv vlady ta upravlinnia Ukrainy [Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine]. [In Russian, in German].
25. Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi arkhiv vyshchykh orhaniv vlady ta upravlinnia Ukrainy [Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government f Ukraine]. Fond. 3676. Inventory 1. Unit. 141. [In German].
26. Kashevarova N. G. (2005). Dejatelnost sondershtaba “Nauka” Operativnogo shtaba reikhsljaitera Rosenberga po konfyskatsii tsennostej nauchnykh uchrezhdenij Ukrainy (1941–1943 gg.). Biblioteki natsionalnykh akademyjnauk: problemy funktsionirovanija, tendentsii razvitja, 3, pp. 298–316. [In Russian].
27. Tsentralnyi derzhavnyi arkhiv vyshchykh orhaniv vlady ta upravlinnia Ukrainy [Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine]. Fond 3676. Inventory 1. Unit. 215. [In German].
28. Ibid. Unit 226. [In German].
29. Ibid. Fond KMF-8. Inventory 1. Unit 275. Roll 94. [In German].
30. Ibid. Fond 3676. Inventory 1. Unit 102. [In German].
31. Ibid. Unit 222. [In German].
32. BArch, NS 30/169. [In German].

Batanova Tetiana

Documents about the activity of the Jewish political parties in the Ukrainian Central Rada in Kyiv archives and the collection of Judaica Department of V. I. Vernadskyi

Abstract: The aim of the research is to review custodial history, structure and content of documents about the activity of five Jewish political parties in the Ukrainian Central Rada (1917–1918), which are now preserved in several Kyiv state archives (the Central State Archives of Public Organizations of Ukraine, the Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine, the State Archives of Kyiv Region) and Judaica Department of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine.The methodology of the research includes historical-chronological, historical-systematic, and historical-typological approaches. The aforementioned methodological approaches allow to trace the complicated custodial history of the complex of documents and to determine structure, content,and types of documents. The scientific novelty of the paper. The analysis of documents of the Jewish political parties as a complex introduces rare documents from the history of the Jewish representation in the Ukrainian Central Rada and revolutionary period in Ukraine into the scientific circulation, also covers development of archival studies, establishment of new archives and principles of archival work. Conclusions. The documents of five Jewish political parties about their activity in the Ukrainian Central Rada (1917–1918) are now distributed in several Kyiv state archives (the Central State Archives of Public Organizations of Ukraine, the Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine, the State Archives of Kyiv Region) and Judaica Department of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine. Analyzing their custodial history, structure and content, it might be argued that the majority of the documents used to be one complex, a part of one collection from Kultur-lige archives. The further custodial history of these documents might be topic for case study in history of Soviet archival institutions, collections and archival studies in general.

Keywords: documents, archives, Jewish political parties, Ukrainian Central Rada, revolution, Kultur-lige

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.26.311     Citation

• Batanova Tetiana (Institute of Manuscript of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine), batanova@nbuv.gov.ua) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8407-9649

Cite:
Batanova Tetiana (2020). Documents about the activity of the Jewish political parties in the Ukrainian Central Rada in Kyiv archives and the collection of Judaica Department of V. I. Vernadskyi . Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (26) 311-324. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.26.311

References:

1. Ukrainska Tsentralna Rada: Dokumenty i materialy u dvokh tomakh [Ukrainian Central Rada: Documents and Materials in Two Volumes] / V. F. Verstiuk et al. (Comps.), V. A Smolii et al. (Eds.) Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1996. Vol. 1, 587 p.; Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 1997. Vol. 2. [In Ukrainian].
2. Verstiuk V., Ostashko T. Diiachi Ukrainskoi Tsentralnoi Rady: Biohrafichnyi dovidnyk. [Figures of the Ukrainian Central Rada: Biographical Reference Book]. Kyiv, 1998. [In Ukrainian].
3. Naiman O. Ya. Yevreiski partii ta obiednannia Ukrainy (1917–1925): Monohrafiia [Jewish Parties and Associations of Ukraine (1917–1925): Monograph]. Kyiv: Instytut politychnykh i ethnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen NAN Ukrainy [Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine], 1998. 190 p. [In Ukrainian].
4. Abramson H. Jewish Representation in the Independent Ukrainian Governments of 1917–1920. Slavic Review. Autumn, 1991, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 542–550.
5. Abramson H. A Prayer for the Government: Ukrainians and Jews in Revolutionary Times, 1917–1920. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. 255 p.
6. Abramson H. A Prayer for the Government: Ukrainians and Jews in Revolutionary Times, 1917–1920. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999. 255 p. (Ukr. ed.: Abramson H. Molytva za vladu. Ukraintsi ta yevrei v revoliutsiinu dobu (1917–1920) [A Prayer for the Government. Ukrainian and Jews in Revolutionary Times, 1917–1920] / transl. A. Kotenko, O. Nadtoka, T. Batanova, N. Ryndiuk (Eds.). Kyiv: DUKH I LITERA, 2017. 320 p.) [In Ukrainian].
7. Melamed E. Iz istorii sobiraniia i izucheniia evreiskogo pismennogo naslediia na Ukraine v 20–30-e gody XX veka [From the History of Collecting and Studying the Jewish Written Heritage in Ukraine in 1920–1930s]. Judaica Rossica: sb. statei [Judaica Rossica: Article Collection]. Moscow, 2006, iss. 4, pp. 51–76. [In Russian].
8. Melamed E. “Immortalizing the Crime in History…”: The Activities of the Ostjüdisches Historisches Archiv (Kiev–Berlin–Paris, 1920–1940). Russian Jewish Diaspora and European Culture, eds. P. Wagstaff, J. Schulte, and O. Tabachnikova, eds. Leiden and Boston MA: Brill, 2012, pp. 373–386.
9. Melamed E. Sudba arkhiva kievskogo Instituta evreisloi proletarskoi kultury: novye nakhodki [The Fate of the Archives of the Kyiv Institute of Jewish Proletarian Culture: New Discoveries]. Jews and Slavs, vol. 26. Yiddish – 110 Years of a Jewish National Language. Proceedings of the Czernowitz International Commemorative Yiddish Language Conference, 2018, W. Moskovich, ed. Jerusalem–Kyiv: Dukh I Litera, 2020, pp. 251–258, 346. [In Russian].
10. Jewish Documentary Sources in Kiev Archives: A Guide, Efim Melamed, Mark Kupovetsky (Eds.-comps.). Kyiv: DUKH I LITERA, 2006. 752 p. [In Russian and English].
11. Yekelchyk S. Searching for the Ukrainian Revolution. Slavic Review, 2019, Vol. 78, Iss. 4, pp. 942–948. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2019.253
12. Bilous L. Re-thinking the Revolution in Ukraine: The Jewish Experience, 1917–1921. Slavic Review, 2019, Vol. 78, Iss. 4, P. 949–956. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/slr.2019.254
13. Ukrainska Tsentralna Rada: Dokumenty i materialy u dvokh tomakh [Ukrainian Central Rada: Documents and Materials in Two Volumes], vol. 1, p. 157. [In Ukrainian].
14. Gringauz S. The Jewish National Autonomy in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. Russian Jewry: 1917–1967 G. Aronson, ed., et al. NY, South Brunswick, London: Thomas Yoseloff, 1969, pp. 58–71.
15. Peled Y. The Jewish Minority in Inter-War Poland. Minorities in Contemporary and Historical Perspectives, Dalle Mulle Emmanuel, comp. H-Nationalism. January 20, 2020.
16. Tomaszewski J. The Civil Rights of Jews in Poland 1918–1939. Polin: Studies in Polish Jewry, Liverpool University Press, 2004. Volume 8: Jews in Independent Poland, 1918–1939, J. Tomaszewski, A. Polonsky, and E. Mendelsohn, eds., pp. 115–28.
17. Frankel J. The Dilemmas of Jewish Autonomism: the Case of Ukraine 1917–1920. Ukrainian-Jewish Relations in Historical Perspective, P. J. Potichnyj, A. Howard, eds. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, 1990, 2nd ed., pp. 268.
18. Boshyk Y. Between Socialism and Nationalism: Ukrainian-Jewish Relations in Historical Perspective, P. J. Potichnyj, A. Howard, eds. Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies, University of Alberta, 1990, 2nd ed, pp. 173–202.
19. Silberfarb M. The Jewish Ministry and Jewish National Autonomy in Ukraine. Kiev, 1918/19. New York, 1993, pp. 33, 98.
20. Fond 1748, Inventory 1,Unit 97. Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
21. Silberfarb M. The Jewish Ministry and Jewish National Autonomy in Ukraine, pp. 48–49.
22. Fond 1115, Inventory 1, File 29, pp. 97–105.Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
23. Matiash I. B, Papakin H. V. Arkhivy ta arkhivna sprava v Ukrayini 1917–1920 rr. [Archives and Archival Studies in Ukraine 1917–1920]. Narysy istorii arkhivnoi spravy v Ukraini [Sketches of Archival Studies History in Ukraine], I. B. Matyash, K. I. Klymova (Eds.). Kyiv: Vydavn. dim «KM Akademiya», 2002, p. 341. [In Ukrainian].
24. Rosenberg William G. Archiving Russia’s Revolutions. A Companion to the Russian Revolution, D. Orlovsky, ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2020, p. 41.
25. Kazovsky H. Kultur-lige. YIVO Encyclopedia of Jews in Eastern Europe. 2010.
26. Fond 321, Inventory 7, Unit. 7. Judaica Department of Institute of Manuscript of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine.
27. Melamed E. Po sledam arkhiva Kultur-Ligi [Traces of Kultur-Lige Archives]. Paralleli: russko-evreiskii istoriko-literaturnyi i bibliograficheskii almanakh [Parallels: Russian-Jewish history and literature almanac]. Moscow: Dom evreiskoi knigi [House of the Jewish Book], 2015, No. 13–14, pp. 112–113. [In Russian].
28. Ibid., pp.114, 117.
29. Fond 1063, Inventory 1, Unit 1, 2, 6, 7.Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
30. Fond 1063, Inventory 2, Unit 1.Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
31. Fond 1063, Inventory 3, Unit 1.Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
32. Fond 1748, Inventory 1, Unit 8. Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
33. Fond 1854, Inventory 1, Unit 1.Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
34. Fond 1748, Inventory 1, Unit 1. Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
35. Unit 97. Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
36. Fond 2592, Inventory 1, Unit 31. Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine.
37. Fond 41, Inventory 1, Unit 17.Central State Archives of Public Organizations of Ukraine.
38. Fond 41, Inventory 1, Unit 7.Central State Archives of Public Organizations of Ukraine.
39. Fond 41, Inventory 1, Unit 86.Central State Archives of Public Organizations of Ukraine.
40. Izbiratelnaia platforma “Bunda” [Election Platform of the “Bund”]. [place?]: Izdanie tsentralnogo Komiteta Bunda [Publication of the Bund Central Committee], [year?]. 12 p. [In Russian].
41. Programma Evreiskoi Sotsial-Demokraticheskoi Rabochei Partii (“Poalei-Tsion”) [Program of Jewish Social-Democratic Workers Party (“Poalei Tsion”)]. [place?]: Izdanie Petrogradskogo Komiteta [Publication of the Petrograd Committee], [year?]. 32 p. [In Russian].
42. Fond 1786, Inventory 1, Unit 3. State Archives of Kyiv Region.
43. Serheieva I. Z istorii formuvannia kolektsii yevreiskoi literatury Natsionalnoi biblioteky Ukrainy (1918–1939) [From the History of Jewish Literature Collection Formation in the National Library of Ukraine (1918–1939)]. Bibliotechnyi visnyk [Library Bulletin], 1996. No. 6, pp. 13–15. [In Ukrainian].
44. Ryvkina H. A. Tsentralna yevreiska biblioteka im. Vinchevskoho u Kyievi [Winchewsky in Kyiv]. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine. [In Ukrainian].
45. Di Idishe Avtonomie un der Natsionaler Sekretariat in Ukraine: Materialn un Dokumentn [The Jewish Autonomy and the National Secretariat in Ukraine: Materials and Documents]. Kiev: Idisher Farlag, 1920, [8], 330, [46], [8] p. [In Yiddish].

Іvanova Nataliya, Pakhalkova-Soich Tetiana, Prysiazhniuk Oksana

Structural and compositional model of 18th century scientific text

Section: Studies of Archival and Book Fonds

Abstract: The aim of the article is to study the structure of the 18th century French scientific text “Herbier Medical.1759” and, having considered its main logical and semantic components, ontological and functional features,to describe its structural and compositional model. Research methodology. The study revealed the integrateduse of the following methods: descriptive (when inventorying and systematizing the features of the monument);structural with elements of component and distributive analysis (when studying the internal organization of theanalyzed text); quantitative method (specifying the relationship between chapters with different paragraphs).Scientific novelty. It was determined that the title page “Herbier Medical. 1759” is a headline complex that conveysa textual thematic chain; the page is expositional; the introduction is a detailed description of herbal medicines’types on the next four pages; the concentrated content of the manuscript is presented on two pages in theform of a detailed classification of medicinal plants. Having studied the paragraph division of the chaptersdescribing 21 sections of medicinal plants, the authors have identified permanent and volatile components, which ultimately led to the creation of a six-component composite model. Conclusions. In this article, a previouslyunpublished French scientific text of 1759 is introduced into scientific circulation and described, taking into accountits logical-semantic organization on the basis of cognitive and communicative analysis, and ultimately contributesto the study of the history of 18th century natural science and linguistic knowledge. We consider such studies aspromising and necessary that will represent the linguoculturological analysis of phytonyms in “Herbier Medical.1759”, a systematic description of its calligraphy, etc.

Keywords: the Herbarium of I. I. Mechnikov Odesa National University (MSUD), the 18th century manuscript“Herbier Medical contenant vingt et une classes de plantes usuelles dont on fait le plus frequemment usage dansla pratique de la Medecine Rangées selon les vertus qui leur sont les plus generallement reconnues”, French scientifictext of 1759.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.27.035     Citation

• Іvanova Nataliya (I. I. Mechnikov Odesa National University (Odesa, Ukraine), nat-iva@ukr.net) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9614-9587
• Pakhalkova-Soich Tetiana (Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics (Kharkiv, Ukraine), tetiana.pakhalkova-soich@nure.ua) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0459-5868
• Prysiazhniuk Oksana (I. I. Mechnikov Odesa National University (Odesa, Ukraine), ragsphoto@ukr.net) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7357-5516

Cite:
Іvanova Nataliya (2021). Structural and compositional model of 18th century scientific text. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (27) 35-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.27.035

References:

1. Derzhavnyi reyestr naukovykh obyektiv, shcho stanovliat natsionalne nadbannia. Reyestr 4 (dopovnenyi). Dodatok do postanovy KMU vid 22 veresnia 2004 r. No. 1241. Naukovi obyekty, shcho stanovliat natsionalne nadbannia [State register of scientific objects constituting national heritage. Appendix to the resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of September 22, 2004, No. 1241. Scientific objects that constitute the national heritage]. Kyiv, 2004. P. 15. [In Ukrainian].
2. Ivanova N. H. Osoblyvosti perekladu frankomovnykh fakhovykh tekstiv iz florystychnoiu tematykoiu 18-ho stolittia [Features of translation of the 18th century French floristic professional texts]. (Qualification work). Kharkiv, 2020. [In Ukrainian].
3. Ivanova N. H., Tarasova O. A. Koheziya, koherentnist ta tematychna prohresiya: frankomovnyi naukovyi manuskrypt XVIII stolittia [Cohesion, coherence and thematic progression: the 18th century French scientific manuscript]. Modalități conceptuale de dezvoltare a științei moderne: colecție de lucrări științifice «ΛΌГOΣ» cu materiale conferinței științifice și practice internaționale. Vol. 3, 20 noiembrie 2020. Bucureşti, România, 2020. Pp. 101–102. [In Ukrainian].
4. Kovalenko S. H., Bondarenko O. Yu. Skarby herbariyu Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. I. I. Mechnykova. Travnyk XVIII storichchia [Herbarium treasures of I. I. Mechnikov Odesa National University. Herbier of the 18th century]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu [Odesa National University bulletin]. Odesa, 2005. Vol. 10, iss. 5, pp. 191–198. [In Ukrainian].
5. Kovalenko S. H. Herbariy Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. I. I. Mechnykova. Herbarii Ukrainy [Herbarium of I. I. Mechnikov Odesa National University. Index Herbariorum Ucrainicum] / N. M. Shyian (Ed.). Kyiv, 2011. Pp. 222–233. [In Ukrainian].
6. Murashko O. S., Nemertsalov V. V. Roslyny-symvoly Staroho ta Novoho svitu v bibliohrafichnykh dzherelakh [Symbolic plants of the Old and New world in bibliographical sources] Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. [Odesa National University bulletin]. Odesa, 2012. Vol. 17, No. 1 (7), pp. 105–138. [In Ukrainian].
7. Herbier Medical contenant vingt et une classes de plantes usuelles dont on fait le plus frequemment usage dans la pratique de la Medecine Rangées selon les vertus qui leur sont les plus generallement reconnues. Manuscript. 1759. 156 p. [In French].
8. Ivanova N. Herbier manuscript du XVIIIème siècle: Particularités de sa calligraphie [18th century handwritten herbarium. Features of its calligraphy]. INTERTEXT. Nr. 3/4 (39/40). 10th year. Chişinău, ULIM, 2016. Pp. 112–126.

Popova Tatiana

"The Siberian Ladder" in Slavonic writing

Section: Studies of Archival and Book Fonds

Abstract: The aim of the research. The aim of the research is to draw specialists’ attention to the manuscripts of themonument of Slavic literature of the 17th century, known in science as the «Siberian Ladder», the author of whichis traditionally considered to be the Siberian Metropolitan Filofey Leshchinsky. The methodology of the study.The main research method is the linguistic-textological method of analyzing manuscripts. In addition, descriptiveand statistical methods of material analysis are used in the research. The scientific novelty. The article is the firstto express the hypothesis that the author of the «Siberian Ladder» book may be a monk who lived at the end ofthe 17th century in one of the Kyiv monasteries, since the oldest manuscripts of the monument were in use in Kyiv.A systematized updated information on the corpus of manuscripts with the text of «Siberian Ladder» is given. Achronological list of codes with the text of the monument is attached to the article. A total of 32 manuscripts withthe text are named. This list includes 4 books, the fate of which is unknown, with the aim of the possible discoveryof these manuscripts in the future. 14 of the 28 books that have survived nowadays are kept in the collections of theInstitute of Manuscripts of the Library of the Academy of Sciences of Ukraine: in the collection of the Kyiv-PecherskLavra (10), in the collection of Saint Sophia Cathedral (2), in the collection of Kyiv Spiritual Academy (1) and in thecollection of Mykolaivskyi monastery (1). In addition, manuscripts with the text of the «Siberian Ladder» are in thecollections of Russia (5), Romania (4), Greece (3), Lithuania (1) and Belarus (1). Conclusions. It is necessary to carryout a thorough comprehensive historical and philological analysis of the oldest Kyiv manuscripts with the text ofthe «Siberian Ladder». As a result of this analysis, the hypothesis stated in the article about the creation of a bookin a Kyiv monastery by one of the monks of this monastery may be confirmed (perhaps the name of this monk willalso be found). In this case, the opinion established in science that the author of the work was Metropolitan FilofeyLeshchinsky can be debunked. On the other hand, it is necessary to study the biography of Filofey Leshchinsky (theKyiv period of his life) carefully. As a result of this analysis, the hypothesis that the «Siberian Ladder» belongs toMetropolitan Filofey may be confirmed.

Keywords: «Siberian Ladder», Filofey Leshchinsky, «Ladder» of John Climacus, manuscript collections, OldRussian literature.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.27.071     Citation

• Popova Tatiana (Northern Arctic Federal University (Severodvinsk, Russia), lestvic@mail.ru) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-2962

Cite:
Popova Tatiana (2021). "The Siberian Ladder" in Slavonic writing. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (27) 71-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.27.071

References:

1. Panaitescu P. P. Catalogul manuscriselor slavo-române şi slave din Biblioteca Academiei Române. Bucureşti, 2003. Vol. II. (No. 301–600). [In Romanian].
2. Parpulov G. R. Cyrillic Manuscripts in U.S. Public Collections: A Catalogue. Palaeoslavica. Cambridge – Massachusetts, 2010. Vol. 17 (2), pp. 1–53. [In English].
3. Popova T. G. Die Leiter zum Paradies des Johannes Klimakos. Katalog der slavischen Handschriften. Köln–Weimar–Wien: Boehlau-Verlag, 2012. [In German and in Russian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.7788/boehlau.9783412215163
4. Popova T. G. The Greek Manuscripts with the Text of the Ladder of Saint John Climacus: a Preliminary Skeleton List. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, 2018. [In English].
5. Viktorov A. E. Opisi rukopisnykh sobranii v knigokhranilishchakh Severnoi Rossii [Inventories of Manuscript Collections in the Libraries of Northern Russia]. St. Petersburg, 1890. [In Russian].
6. Gorskii A. V., Nevostruev K. I. Opisanie slavianskikh rukopisei Moskovskoi Sinodalnoi (patriarshei) biblioteki. Otd. II. Pisaniia sviatykh ottsov. Ch. 3. Raznye bogoslovskie sochineniia (pribavlenie) [Description of the Slavic Manuscripts of the Moscow Synodal (Patriarchal) Library. Vol. 2. The Writings of the Holy Fathers. Part 3. Different theological Writings (Addition)]. Moscow: Publishing house of Synod, 1862. [In Russian].
7. Dergacheva-Skop E. I., Soboleva L. S. Malenkaia zametka o bolshom nedorazumenii, ili byl li Sviatoi Filofei Leshchinskii avtorom Sibirskogo Lestvichnika? [A small note about a big misunderstanding, or Whether Saint Philothei (Leshchinsky) was the author of Sibirskij Lestvichnik?]. Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. St. Petersburg, 2019. Vol. 1 (25), pp. 193–200. [In Russian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu19.2019.114
8. Popova T. G. Kievskie rukopisi Lestvitsy Ioanna Sinaiskogo [Kiev Manuscripts of the Ladder of John Climacus]. Rukopysna ta knyzhkova spadschyna Ukrainy [Manuscript and Book Heritage of Ukraine]. Kyiv, 2019. Iss. 23, pp. 56–71. [In Russian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.23.056
9. Popova T. G. Lestvica Ioanna Sinaiskogo v perevode Paisiia Velichkovskogo [The Ladder of John Climacus in the Translation of Paisius Velichkovsky]. Afonska spadshchyna. Naukovyi almanah. Vydannia Mizhnarodnoho instytutu afonskoi spadshchyny v Ukraini [Athos Heritage. Scientific almanac. Edition of the International Institute of Athos Heritage in Ukraine]. Kyiv-Chernihiv: Publishing of University, 2016. Vol. 3–4, pp. 186–196. [In Russian].
10. Popova T. G. Sibirskii Lestvichnik Filofeia Leshhinskogo i ego rukopisi [The Siberian Ladder of Philothei Leshchinsky and his manuscripts]. Rukopisi, staropechatnye i redkie knigi v sobraniiakh Rossii [Manuscripts, old-print and rare books in the collections of Russia]. Novosibirsk: Publishing of Russian National Public Library for Science and Technology, 2018. Pp. 115–128. [In Russian].
11. Prepodobnyi Paisii Velichkovskii. Zhitie i izbrannye tvoreniia [Saint Paisius Velichkovsky. Life and Favorite Creations] / trans. A. P. Vlasiuk. Serpukhov: Publishing "The Heritage of the Orthodox East", 2014. [In Russian].
12. Prokhorov G. M. Lestvitsa [Ladder]. Slovar knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevnei Rusi [The Dictionary of Scribes and Bookishness of Ancient Rus']. Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoi literatury [Proceedings of the Department of Old Russian Literature]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1985. Vol. 39, pp. 253–258. [In Russian].
13. Sviatitel Filofey Leshchinskii. Sibirskii Lestvichnik [Saint Filofey Leshchinsky. Siberian Ladder] / M. Bakulin, T. Saifullin (Eds.). Tyumen: Russian Week, Tyumen Publishing House, 2015. [In Russian].

Dobrolyubska Yuliya, Prysiazhniuk Oleksii

Old print by Mark Fabius Quintilian from the library of the K. D. Ushynsky South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University

Section: Studies of Archival and Book Fonds

Abstract: The aim of the work is to analyze the historical context of the origin and content of the legacy of Marc Fabius Quintilian on the basis of the invented old print «Instructions to the Orator» in 1665. The research methodology is a set of principles of historicism, objectivity, systematics. The main research methods are historiographical and bibliographic, as well as the method of historical and bibliological and terminological analysis. The scientific novelty of the topic lies, first of all, in the formulation of the problem of scientific research of old prints of the funds of small libraries of Ukraine, which often keep in their bookstores rare and valuable publications. Such studies make it possible to identify gaps and identify promising areas for further research. Significant ideology of the library storage system during the Soviet era, low level of proficiency in classical languages and even the languages of European countries of library staff sometimes led to almost complete loss of outstanding copies of human memory from scientific and educational circulation. The figure of Mark Fabius Quintilian has rarely been the subject of historical research. «Instructions to the Orator», the main and only authentic work of Quintilian, which has survived to our time, has a strong technical focus and provides rich material, especially to classic philologists, historians of pedagogy and rhetoric. However, this material does not exhaust the content of «Instructions to the Orator». Many of the plots of Quintilian's major work have a historical context and political coloration and are of great interest to researchers. Conclusions: «Instructions to the Orator» differs from the usual textbook on rhetoric in that Quintilian proclaims his goal not only to teach the technique of eloquence, but also to educate a perfect speaker. The fruit of eloquence, according to Quintilian, a true speaker should see not in selfishness or payment, but in himself, in his knowledge and nobility of thought. Such a position is natural in the framework of normative policy ideas about the free activity of a citizen in the public field. Thus, although in a somewhat modernized form, Quintilian gives all his advantages to the polis ideal of the speaker.

Keywords: old print, rhetoric, oratory, Mark Fabius Quintilian, recitations, funds, catalogs.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.28.023     Citation

• Dobrolyubska Yuliya (K. D. Ushynsky South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University, Ukraine, Odesa, jdobrol@ukr.net) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3564-854X
• Prysiazhniuk Oleksii (K. D. Ushynsky South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University, Ukraine, Odesa, a_pank@ukr.net) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3727-5350

Cite:
Dobrolyubska Yuliya (2022). Old print by Mark Fabius Quintilian from the library of the K. D. Ushynsky South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (28) 23-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.28.023

References:

1. M. Fabii Quintiliani. Declamationes cum variorum notis. T. 2. Lugd. Batav. et Roterod [Leiden and Rotterdam]: Ex. Officina Hackiana, 1665. 791 p.
2. Istoriia rimskoi literatury [History of Roman Literature] / S. I. Sobolevski, M. E. Grabar-Passek, F. A. Petrovski (Eds.). Moskow, 1962. Pp. 143–156. [In Russian].
3. Two Renaissance Book Hunters: The Letters of Poggius Bracciolini to Nicolaus De Niccolis / transl. P. W. G. Gordon. Columbia : Columbia Un. Press, 1991. 393 p.
4. Shepherd W. The Life of Poggio Bracciolini. London : Andesite Press, 2017. 482 p.
5. Winterbottom M. Quintilian and the Vir Bonus // Journal of Roman studies. 1964. Vol. 54. Pp. 90–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/298654
6. Borzunov A. A. K voprosu o politicheskikh vzgliadakh Kvintiliana [On Issue Of Kvintilian’s Political Views] // Politicheskaia struktura i obshhestvennaia zhizn drevnego Rima: Problemy antichnoj gosudarstvennosti [Political Structure and Social Life of Ancient Rome : Problems of Ancient Statehood]. Yaroslavl, 1993. Pp. 66–76. [In Russian].
7. Gasparov M. L. Ciceron i antichnaja ritorika [Cicero and Ancient Oratory] // Mark Tullii Ciceron. Tri traktata ob oratorskom iskusstve [Marcus Tullius Cicero. Three Treatises on Oratory]. Μoskow, 1972. Pp. 7–73. [In Russian].
8. Kuznetsova T. I., Strelnikova I. P. Oratorskoe iskusstvo v Drevnem Rim [Oratory in Ancient Rome]. Μoskow, 1976. 288 p. [In Russian].
9. Albrekht M. fon. Istoriia rimskoi literatury [History of Roman Literature]. Μoskow, 2004. Pp. 1365–1376. [In Russian].

Skrypnyk Petro

Posters collection of agricultural production from fonds of Fine Arts Department of Institute of Book Studies of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine

Section: History of Book Collections and Gatherings

Abstract: The aim of the research . The article displays the processes of agricultural production in Ukraineas reflected in visual media, posters in particular. In contrast with the vast majority of researchers who viewed posters as an effective means of indoctrinating the society, the author states that they also playedan essential role in the development of country’s productive forces. With certain reservations, these can beconsidered as poster witnesses providing the visual evidence of the Ukrainian history of the 1920-ies. The research methodology is based on the method of comparative analysis in the presentation of socio-political processes in Ukraine in the period mentioned. Scientific novelty of the research consists in re-considering the principal postulates of the Soviet historiography of the 1920-ies with reliance on posters as visual information sources. The viewpoint that under the influence of Bolshevik propaganda the Ukrainian citizens unanimously started building a new society is contrary to actual facts. Without denyingthe effect of propaganda on social life, the author stresses the necessity of a more balanced approach to the processes that took place in the critical periods of Ukrainian history. In particular, attention should bedrawn to the repressive measures of Soviet authorities against the prevailing majority of Ukraine’s population. This research is carried out in an alternative direction of studying the socio-political history of Ukraine in the 1920-ies. Conclusions. The analysis of the posters examined has shown that those concerned with agricultural production played not a marginal, but, probably, even a major part in the growth of Ukrainian peasants’ self-consciousness as compared with political posters. New technological ideas and the methods of their implementation, which posters presented, rather than a stock of stereotype communist slogans, played the decisive role in the rise of agricultural production in Ukraine. Skillfully composed and masterfully made, they, on the one hand, became the pieces of figurative art and, on the other, – an ideal means of communication in the milieu of semi-literate rural citizens. They also are an essential supplement to the textual history of the Ukrainian agriculture of the 1920-ies.

Keywords: poster, poster collection, visualization of scientific studies, agricultural production posters.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.28.116     Citation

• Skrypnyk Petro (V. I. Vernadsky National Library of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv, mini-petarda@ukr.net) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7542-6933

Cite:
Skrypnyk Petro (2022). Posters collection of agricultural production from fonds of Fine Arts Department of Institute of Book Studies of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (28) 116-145. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.28.116

References:

1. Kondratiuk K. Radianska Ukraina 20–30-h rokiv XX st.: suchasnyi istoriohrafichnyi dyskurs[Soviet Ukraine in the 1920–1930-ies: present-day historiographic discourse]. Visnyk LvivskohoUniversytetu. Seria: istorychna [Bulletin of Lviv University. History series]. 2013. Iss. 48, pp.245–261. [In Ukrainian].
2. Kalinichenko V. V. Instytut zemelnoi hromady v dokolhospnomu seli Naddniprianskoi Ukrainy (1917–1930 rr.) [The land community in the pre-kolhosp village of the Naddiprianskyi region of Ukraine (1917–1930-ies)]. (Extended abstract of Doctor’s thesis). Odesa, 2015. 36 p. [In Ukrainian].
3. Vaskivska O. Knyhovydavnycha diialnist v USRR u 1926 r.: tendentsii ta osoblyvosti rozvytku[Book publishing in the USRR in 1926: development trends and peculiarities]. Visnyk Knyzhkovoipalaty [Book Chamber Bulletin]. 2016. No. 2, pp. 38–45. [In Ukrainian].
4. Chaus N. V. Sovetskie plakaty 1917–1920 gg. – osnovnoe sredstvo propagandy sotsialisticheskoiideologii [Soviet posters of 1917–1920-ies as the main instrument of socialist ideologypropaganda]. Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tambov StateUniversity]. 2010. No. 6, pp. 220–223. [In Russian].
5. Lezhen E. E. Plakat kak sredstvo politicheskoi agitatsii in 1917–1930-e gg. [Posters asinstruments of political propaganda in the 1917–1930-ies]. Vestnik Saratovskogo gosudarstvennogo sotsialno-ekonomicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Saratov State Socio-Economic University]. 2013. No. 3, pp. 122–124. [In Russian].
6. Avramenko A. V. Radianskyi plakat 1920–1930 rokiv yak zasib propagandy [Soviet poster of the1920–1930-ies as an instrument of propaganda]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA [Scientific Notes ofthe National University Kyiv-Mohyla Academy]. 2010. Vol. 101: Teoriia ta istoriia kultury[Culture Theory and History], pp. 66–72. [In Ukrainian].
7. Prysiazhniuk M. V. Silskohospodarska periodyka v Ukraini: istorychnyi ekskurs [Agriculturalperiodicals in Ukraine: a historical essay]. Istoriia nauki i biohrafistyka. [History of Science andBiographistics]. 2010. Iss. 2. (accessed November 10, 2020). [In Ukrainian].
8. Skrypnyk P. I. Plakaty yak dzherelo doslidzhennia suspilno-politychnykh protsesiv v Ukraini u 20-h rokah XX st. [Posters as a source for studying socio-political processes in Ukraine in the 1920-ies]. Naukovyi visnyk of NBUV [Scientific Bulletin of V. I. Vernadskyi National Library of Ukraine]. 2020. Iss. 60, pp. 137–157. [In Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/np.60.137
9. Istoriia Vsesoiuznoi Kommunisticheskoi partii (bolshevikov). Kratkii kurs. [History of the All-Union Communist Party (of Bolsheviks). A Brief Course]. Moskow, 1938. 638 p. [In Russian].
10. Molotkina V. K. Stanovlennia radianskoi vydavnychoi merezhi v USRR v pershii polovyni20-h rokiv [The development of Soviet publishing network in the USRR in the first half of the1920-ies]. Istorychna pamiat [Historical Memory]. 2012. Iss. 27, pp. 101–108. [In Ukrainian].
11. Doyar L. Ahrarna respublika u skladi soiuzu. [Agrarian republic as a part of the union].Holos Ukrainy [Voice of Ukraine]. 2020, June, 3. [In Ukrainian].
12. Efetov Fedir Saveliiovych [Yefetov Fedir Saveliiovych]. Entsyklopediia suchasnoi Ukrainy [Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine. In 30 volumes]. Kyiv, 2009. ( accessed February 16, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
13. Sheliuha [Red willow]. (accessed March 21, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
14. Saksonov S. V. Pervye chleny russkogo botanicheskogo obshchestva. [First members of theRussian Botanical Society]. Samarskaya Luka: Problemy regionalnoi i globalnoi ekologii[Samara Bend: Problems of Regional and Global Ecology]. 2015. Vol. 242. No. 2, pp. 197–212.[In Russian].
15. Narodyvsia Andrii Sapehin, botanik, tsytoloh, selektsioner, odyn z avtorytetnishykh ukrainskykh henetykiv, akademik NANU, vitseprezydent NANU (Andrii Sapehin, botanist, cytologist, plant breeder, one of the most prominent Ukrainian scientists in genetics, NAS Academician, NAS Vice-President, was born]. (accessed March 09, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
16. Molotkina V. K. Osoblyvosti orhanizatsiinoho stanovlennia ta funktsionuvanniaderzhavnych vydavnytstv v USRR (20-i roky XX st.). [Peculiarities of organizationaldevelopment and functioning of state publishers in the USRR (the 1920-ies)]. Paradyhmapiznannia: humanitarni pytannia [Cognition Paradigm: Humanities Issues]. 2016. No. 1(12), pp.1–17. [In Ukrainian].
17. Helei S. D. Knyhospilka. [“Knyhospilka” Publishers]. Entsyklopedia suchasnoi Ukrainy. [Encyclopedia of Modern Ukraine in 30 volumes]. Kyiv, 2013. (accessed February 23, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
18. Prysiazhniuk M. V. Merezha silskohospodarskykh naukovo-doslidnych ustanov u 20-hrokach XX st. v Ukraini [The network of agricultural scientific research institutions in Ukraine inthe 1920-ies]. Zroshuvalne zemlerobstvo [Irrigation Agriculture]. 2012. Iss. 57, pp. 289–293. [InUkrainian].
19. Nosivska selektsiino-doslidna stantsiia. [Nosivska Breeding Research Station]. (accessed February 23, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
20. Redkin Andrei Petrovich [Redkin Andrei Petrovich]. Kratkie biografii [Brief Biographies]. (accessed March 12, 2021). [In Russian].
21. Ahronomichni pryntsypy vyroshchuvannia soniashnyka [Agronomical principles of sunflower cultivation]. (accessed March 01, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
22. Kulzhynskyi S. P. Entsyclopediia Nosivshchyny [Encyclopedia of Nosivskyi District].Retrieved from: http://wiki.nosivka.info.pdf (accessed February 26, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
23. Yuriev Vasyl Yakovych – NAN Ukrainy [NAS of Ukraine]. (accessed March 05, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
24. Moskovskii khudozhnik Poroshin Ivan Sergeevich [Moscow painter Poroshin IvanSergeevich]. (accessedMarch 02, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
25. Istoriia khrama Apostola Andreia Pervozvannogo i novomuchenikov i ispovednikov Russkikh pri agrarnom universitete [History of the Church of St. Andrew the First-Called and New Martyrs and Confessors in the Agrarian University]. (accessed March 10, 2021). [In Russian].
26. Dyskuvannia [Disking]. (accessed February16, 2021). [In Ukrainian].
27. Pitenina V. Hudozhni ta stylistychni osoblyvosti hrafiky Petra Lapina – ilustratora dytiachoi knyhy pershoi tretyny XX st. [Artistic and stylistic features of graphic works by Petro Lapin – illustrator of children’s books of the first third of the 20th century]. Ukrainska akademiia mystetstva. Doslidnytski ta naukovo-metodychni pratsi [Ukrainian Academy of Arts. Research and Scientific Methodology Works]. 2018. Iss. 27, pp. 193–199. [In Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.33838/naoma.27.2018.193-199
28. AT Elvorti. [Elvorti JSC]. Ofitsiinyi sait [Official site]. (accessed March 10, 2021). [In Ukrainian].

Kashevarova Nataliya

Documents of the Commissioner of the Fuehrer for the supervision of the entire intellectual and ideological schooling and training of the NSDAP (1934–1945) of Alfred Rosenberg in the Federal Archives of Germany: a source study aspect

Section: Studies in Spesial Historical Disciplines

Abstract: The purpose of the research is to characterize the composition and content of the documents of the Commissioner of the Fuehrer for the Supervision of the Entire Intellectual and Ideological Schooling and Training of the NSDAP (here in after – the Rosenberg Office) to determine the place of these documents in the source base of the study of the history of the Third Reich, to analyze their information potential as sources on the history of national socialist ideology and occupation policy. The research methodologyis based on scientific principles of historicism, objectivity, and systematicity, represented by historical-comparative and historical-archival methods, as well as methods of source analysis. The scientific novelty. The documents of the Rosenberg Office as a complete documentary complex have not yet been the subject of scientific research, although some historians have used these documents as sources for the history of National Socialism, A. Rosenberg’s biographical portrait, but they were not considered as sources for the ideological component of the Nazi occupation policy. Conclusions. A brief analysis of the documents of the Rosenberg Office allows us to conclude that these documents are valuable sources for studying the history of the development of the National Socialism ideology and itsinfluence through the NSDAP system. Among them, there are plans, orders, instructions, reflecting objectives and structure of the Rosenberg Office, functionsof its departments, ideological materialson anti-Semitism, Bolshevism, religion, as well as reference materialson National Socialist figures in the field of culture. A special place amongthe documents of the Service is held by materials covering its participation in the ideological training of Wehrmacht officers, as well as biographical sources documents on the activities of the staff of the Rosenberg Office. These documents also reveal its ties with a wide range of ot her Nazi agencies that participated in the process of creating Nazi propaganda.

Keywords: World War II, National Socialism, ideology, the Commissioner of the Fuehrer for the Supervision of the Entire Intellectual and Ideological Schooling and Training of the NSDAP, archival documents, the Federal Archives of Germany.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.29.281     Citation

• Kashevarova Nataliya (Institute of History of Ukraine of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine, Kyiv, nataliya.kashevarova@gmail.com) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-0440

Cite:
Kashevarova Nataliya (2022). Documents of the Commissioner of the Fuehrer for the supervision of the entire intellectual and ideological schooling and training of the NSDAP (1934–1945) of Alfred Rosenberg in the Federal Archives of Germany: a source study aspect. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (29) 281-299. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.29.281

References:

1. Bollmus R. Das Amt Rosenberg und seine Gegner: Studien zum Machtkampf im nationalsozialistischen Herrschaftssystem. München: R. Oldenburg Verlag, 2006. 373 S. [In German]. doi: https://doi.org/10.1524/9783486595543
2. Piper E. Alfred Rosenberg: Hitlers Chefideologe. München: Karl Blessing Verlag, 2005. 831 S. [In German].
3. Koop V. Alfred Rosenberg: Der Wegbereiter des Holocaust – Eine Biographie. Köln/Wien: Böhlau Verlag, 2016. 346 S. [In German]. doi: https://doi.org/10.7788/9783412506469
4. Bukhanov V. A. Gitlerovskyi “novyi poriadok” v Evrope i ego krakh (1933–1945) [Hitler's "new order" in Europe and its collapse (1933–1945)]. Yekaterinburg, 2013. 466 p. [In Russian].
5. Sebta T. Ukrainska chastka Skhidnoi biblioteky Rosenberha (1941–1945) [Ukrainian share of the Rosenberg Eastern Library (1941–1945)]. Ukrainskyi arkheohrafichnyi shchorichnyk [Ukrainian archeographic yearbook]. Iss. 12, pp. 299–318. [In Ukrainian].
6. Bollmus, R. Zum Projekt einer nationalsozialistischen Alternativ-Universität. Alfred Rosenbergs “Hohe Schule”. In: Heinemann, M. (Hrsg.): Erziehung und Schulung im Dritten Reich, Teil 2. Klett-Cotta, Stuttgart, 1980. S. 125–152. [In German].
7. Stieber G. (2015). Die Bibliothek der “Hohe Schule des Nationalsozialismus in Tanzenberg” in Carinthia. In: Carinthia I, Zeitschrift für geschichtliche Landeskunde von Kärnten. 2015. 185. Jg, S. 343–363. [In German].
8. Bundesarchiv Berlin, NS 15/314. [In German].
9. Ibid., NS 8/203. [In German].
10. Ibid., R 58/3556. [In German].
11. Organizatsiia Natsional-sotsialisticheskoi nemetskoi rabochei partii [Organization of the National Socialist German Workers' Party. 1938.]. Riga, 2002. [In Russian].
12. Bundesarchiv Berlin, NS 15/188. [In German].
13. Ibid., NS 8/165. [In German].
14. Ibid., NS 8/167. [In German].
15. Ibid., NS 8/182. [In German].
16. Organisationsbuch der NSDAP. München: Zentralverlag der NSDAP, 1943. 750 S. [In German].

Ignatenko Yevgeniya

Moldavian and Ukrainian-Belarusian church chant traditions: common repertoire as a fact of interaction

Section: Studies of Archival and Book Fonds

Abstract: The goal of the research. Our re cent attribution of kalophonic Greek chants from Ukrainian and Belarusian staff-notated manuscripts of the late 16th–18th centuries proved their Eastern origin and the fact of borrowing. The question arises where Ukrainian and Belarusian singers mastered Greek-Byzantine chant. It is logical to assume that the Greek repertoire appeared thanks to Ukrainian-Moldavian contacts, since the Moldavian chant tradition, which flourished in the 16th century, is based on the Byzantine one. The works of Greek-Byzantine composers make up most of the repertoire of the 16th century Moldavian manuscripts. The goal of the research is to compare the Greek repertoire of Moldavian and Ukrainian-Belarusian musical manuscripts and to define the peculiarities of its fixation in Middle Byzantine and Kyiv staff notations. Methodology. A comparative method of studying Greek-Byzantine, Moldavian and Ukrainian-Belarusian musical manuscripts is used. Scientific novelty. It has been found out that kalophonic works of Greek-Byzantine composers, written down in the Ukrainian and Belarusian staff-notated Heirmologia of the late 16th–18th centuries, are presented in the Moldavian Anthologies of the16th century. Also, in Ukrainian and Belarusian manuscripts, we managed to authorize the Greek-language Cherubic song of the plagal 1st mode of the out standing Moldavian composer Evstatie, the Protopsaltes of Putna (ca. †1546). Conclusions. The common Greek repertoire of Moldavian and Ukrainian Belarusian manuscripts, as well as the work of Evstatie, recorded in Ukrainian and Belarusian Heirmologia, testify to the direct connection of Moldavian and Ukrainian-Belarusian church chant traditions and prove that the 16th century Moldavian musical school became an intermediary in the involvement of Ukrainian singers in the Greek-Byzantine chant tradition and had a powerful influence on the development and renewal of Ukrainian and Belarusian church chant in the late 16th–17th centuries.

Keywords: Ukrainian-Belarusian church chant tradition, Moldavian church chant tradition, staff-notated Heirmologia, Moldavian musical Anthologies, common Greek repertoire, kalophonic chant, Middle Byzantine notation, Kyiv notation, musical exegesis, Evstatie, protopsaltes of the Putna monastery.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.30.027     Citation

• Ignatenko Yevgeniya (Ukrainian National Tchaikovsky Academy of Music, Ukraine, Kyiv, evgeniaopus31@gmail.com) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8048-2991

Cite:
Ignatenko Yevgeniya (2023). Moldavian and Ukrainian-Belarusian church chant traditions: common repertoire as a fact of interaction. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (30) 27-40. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.30.027

References:

1. Dubrovina L. A. Supraslskyi Irmoloi 1601 roku: deiaki aspekty kodykolohichnoho doslidzhennia [Suprasl Heirmologion, 1601: Some aspects of codicological research] Rukopysna ta knyzhkova spadshchyna Ukrainy [Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine]. Kyiv, 1993. Iss. 1, pp. 13–20. [In Ukrainian].
2. Ihnatenko Ye. V. Atrybutsiia hretskykh spiviv z ukrainskykh i biloruskykh Irmoloiv kintsia XVI–XVIII stolit [Attribution of the Greek Chants from the Ukrainian and Belarusian Heirmologia of the late 16th – 18th centuries]. Studii mystetstvoznavchi: Teatr. Muzyka. Kino [Researches of the Fine Arts: Theatre. Music. Sinema]. Kyiv: M. Rylskyi Institute of Art Studies, Folkloristics and Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 2019. No. 1 (65), pp. 29–38. [In Ukrainian].
3. Ihnatenko Ye. V. Hretskyi repertuar ukrainskykh i biloruskykh Irmoloiv kintsia XVI–XVIII stolit: suchasnyi stan doslidzhen [Greek Repertoire of the Ukrainian and Belarusian Heirmologia of the late 16th – 18th centuries: Present Status of Research]. Naukovi zbirky Lvivskoi natsionalnoi muzychnoi akademii imeni M. V. Lysenka [Scientific collections of the Lviv National Music Academy named after M. V. Lysenko]. 2021. Iss. 47, pp. 17–31. [In Ukrainian]. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2310-0583-2021-47.03
4. Lucyk R. Hram Uspeniia Bogoroditsy vo Lvove [The Church of the Virgin’s Assumption in Lviv]. Yubileinyi sbornik v pamiat 350-letiia lvovskogo Stavropigiona. Ch. II. Vremennik. Nauchno-literaturnye zapiski lvovskogo Stavropigiona na 1936 i 1937 gody [Anniversary Collection in Commemoration of the 350th Anniversary of Lviv Stavropigion. Part II. The Temporary. Scientific and Literary Notes of Lviv Stavropigion for 1936 and 1937]. Stauropegion Institute in Lviv, 1937. Pp. 48–51. [In Russian].
5. Toncheva E. B. Manastyrъt Holiam Skyt – shkola na "bolharskyi rospev". Skytsky "bolharsky" Yrmolozy ot XVII–XVII v. [The Velikij Skit (Skit Mare) Monastery – a School of “Bolgarskij Rospev”. “Bolgarski” Heirmologia of the 17th – 18th centuries from the Skit Monastery]. In 2 vol. Sofia: Music, 1981. [In Bulgarian].
6. Yasynovskyi Yu. P. Ukrainski ta biloruski notoliniini Irmoloi 16–18 stolit. Kataloh i kodykolohichno-paleohrafichne doslidzhennia [Ukrainian and Belarusian staff-notated Heirmologia of the 16th – 18th centuries. Catalogue and paleographical study]. Lviv: Missionary, 1996. 624 p. [In Ukrainian].
7. Conomos D. The Monastery of Putna and the Musical Tradition of Moldavia in the Sixteenth Century. Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 1982. Vol. 36. Pp. 15–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1291460
8. Kujumdzieva S. The Significance of the Putna Music School in the History of Orthodox Church Music. Analele Putnei, XVII, 2021, 1. Pp. 287–302.
9. Moisescu T. Muzica bizantină în spaţiul cultural românesc. Bucureşti: Editura Muzicală a Uniumii Compozitorilor şi Muzicologilor din România, 1996. 348 p.
10. Pennington A. Seven Akolouthiai from Putna. Studies in Eastern Chant. N. Y., 1979. Vol. IV. Pp. 112–133.
11. Tončeva E. Die Skitische Musikhandschriftenfamilie des Bolgarskij Rospev von 17.-18. Jh. Und die spätpostbyzantinische Musikpraxis. Acta Musicae Byzantinae. Revista Centrului de Studii Bizantine, Jaşi, 2005. Vol. VIII. Pp. 55–62.
12. Tončeva E. The Bulgarian Liturgical Chant (9th–19th centuries). Rhythm in Byzantine Chant. Hernen, 1991. Pp. 141–193.

Hasanov Elnur Latif oglu

Innovative study of historical heritage of Ganja city based on cultural-literary materials

Section: Studies in Spesial Historical Disciplines

Abstract: The purpose of the study is to include into scientific circulation ancient written sources and archival documents on the history of the development of science and education of the Renaissance period in Ganja city of Azerbaijan. The methods used for this study included historical and comparative research metod, chronological, source method. Scientific novelty. The peculiarities of the development of science and education of the Renaissance period in the city of Ganja, Azerbaijan, were determined for the first time. Conclusions. This research work studies the features of development of science and education of the Renaissance period in Ganja city of Azerbaijan on the basis of ancient written scientific sources and archival documents. The scientific work also studies processes of teaching of social, humanitarian and natural sciences in Ganja during this historical period, the services of prominent scientists, thinkers and teachers of that period, who worked in madrasa and used rich libraries. In particular, given the importance of the city as a socio-political, economic, scientific and cultural center, the research involved the scientific achievements of local scholars of the Middle Ages. By the way, during this historical period, Ganja, as an important political and cultural center, was visited by famous scholars of the Muslim East, and important historical information about their teaching and scientific activities have been studied for many years. The merits and patronage of the Azerbaijani state of Atabeys, which played an exceptional role in the development of the traditions of our national statehood, the formation of prominent figures in science and culture, are considered in the scientific article on the basis of available scientific sources, historical documents, written sources. Also this study, based on historical and ethnographic sources, determined the significance of the scientific, literary and cultural contribution of Ganja in the development of the characteristic features of the Renaissance period not only of the country, but also in the development of the Islamic world as a whole. It also examines the works of the predecessors and successors of Sheikh Nizami that promote national traditions, universal human values and calling for fruitful coexistence of cultures.

Keywords: Ganja, Azerbaijan, urban culture, historical research, cultural traditions.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.31.271     Citation

• Hasanov Elnur Latif oglu (Ganja Branch of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Azerbaijan, Ganja, lnurh273@gmail.com) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6358-593X

Cite:
Hasanov Elnur Latif oglu (2023). Innovative study of historical heritage of Ganja city based on cultural-literary materials. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (31) 271-286. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.31.271

References:

1. Hasanov E. L. Innovative significance of research of traditional architectural features of Ganja. TSU-TI — The International Scientific Journal of Humanities. 2022. No. 1(1). Pp. 71-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.55804/TSU-ti-1/Hasanov
2. Azerbaijan ethnography: in 3 vol. Vol. 1. Baku: Sharg-Garb., 2007. 544 p.
3. Alizadeh A. A. Socio-economical and political history of Azerbaijan in XIII-XIV centuries. Baku: AS of Az SSR, 1956. P. 17.
4. Hasanov E. L. Ganja Imamzadeh tomb. Baku: Elm va tahsil., 2012. 268 p.
5. Azerbaijan art. Vol. 8. Baku: Elm., 1959. 276 p.
6. Ahmadov F. M. Historical mind of Ganja. Ganja: Elm., 2007. 246 p.
7. Hasanov E. L. Innovative research of urban heritage of Ganja based on the local epigraphic monuments. 2nd International Science and Engineering Conference. 2021. Pp. 28-31.
8. Ganja branch of Azerbaijan Republic National Archive. F. 20, d. 1, w. 17.
9. Mustafayev A. N. Handicrafts in Azerbaijan. Baku: Altay, 2001. 232 p.
10. Hasanov E. L. Innovative research of national wisdom in works of Nizami Ganjavi. International Scientific Journal Theoretical and Applied Science. 2022. Iss. 01, vol. 105, pp. 475-481. doi: https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2022.01.105.36
11. Hasanov E. L. Applied significance of investigation of handicrafts branches in Ganja city based on innovative technologies (Historical-ethnographic research). Prague: Vědecko vydavatelské centrum "Sociosféra-CZ" (Czech Republic), 2018. 110 p. ISBN 978-80-7526-323-0
12. Historical book of Elizavetpol province for 1910. Elizavetpol, 1914. 337 p.
13. Guliyeva N. M., and Hasanov E. L. Investigation of basic decorative-applied arts of Ganja on the basis of some innovative arguments and technologies. Science and Society: Proceedings of the 3rd International scientific-practical conference. London: Scieuro, 2013. Pp. 281-291
14. Hasanov E. L. To the Question on Research of Craftsmanship Traditions of Ganja of XIX – First Half of XX Centuries. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. 2015. Vol. 6. No. 1. Part S1. Pp. 433-437. doi: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1s1p433
15. Mustafayev J. M. Craftsmanship organizations during the Middle ages. Jahan journal. 1998. No. 4. Pp. 17-21.
16. Häsänow E. L. Ethno-anthropologische merkmale der Gändschänischen Teppiche von XIX-XX jahrhundert (auf die 220-jährige jubiläum der Aserbaidschanischen gelehrten und dichter gewidmet Mirsä Schäfi Waseh). Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2014. No. 1. Pp. 3-4
17. Azerbaijan archaeology: In 6 vol. Vol. 6. Baku: Sharg-Garb., 2008. 632 p.
18. Hasanov E. L. Local Ganja carpets as the samples of contemporary museum studies. Conferinţa ştiinţifică internaţională a Muzeului Naţional de Istorie a Moldovei. Istorie - Arheologie - Muzeologie. Ediţia 31, 28-29 octombrie 2021, Chisinau. Chişinău: Bons Offices SRL, 2021. Pp. 139-140.
19. Tabeikyna E. K., Kamalova G. T., Hasanov E. L., Dzhumagaliyeva K. V., and Demeuova N. K. The place of intelligentsia in socio-economic development of society: the creative perspective. Creativity Studies. 2021. 14 (1). Pp. 235-250. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.13639
20. Hasanov E. L. Innovative study of historical-ethnographic and cultural heritage of Ganja city for Renaissance period. International Scientific Journal Theoretical and Applied Science. 2021. Iss. 02, vol. 94. Pp. 248-254. doi: https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2021.02.94.53

Hаsanov Elnur Latif oglu

Significance of the written sources in study of medieval heritage of Ganja

Section: Studies in Spesial Historical Disciplines

Abstract: The purpose of the study is to include into scientific circulation the historical and literary manuscripts as the ancient written sources on the cultural heritage of the research of the medieval past of Ganja city. The methods used for this study included historical and comparative research metod, chronological, source method. Scientific novelty. The main features of the socio-cultural development, also literary heritage of the Renaissance period in Ganja, Azerbaijan, were determined based on various manuscripts and archival documents for the first time. Conclusions. This research work studies the basic features of manuscripts, different historical documents on the past of Ganja city as the sources in research of the cultural and sociological development during the Renaissance period. The life and creation of such genius persons as Nizami Ganjavi have been studied based on archival materials, various written sources, historical documents, literary samples for the medieval period on the basis of comparative scientific approach. Manuscripts or reprints of original works of prominent personalities, who lived during this period were included in the scientific circulation as a fundamental source. Also, some controversial points on research of the typical features of development of Ganja city, life and activities of the famous historical persons are clarified based on the investigation of the scientific sources and materials.

Keywords: Azerbaijan, Ganja, manuscripts, historical research, cultural values.

  Full-text PDF    https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.32.116     Citation

• Hаsanov Elnur Latif oglu (Ganja Branch of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, Ganja, Azerbaijan, lnurh273@gmail.com) ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6358-593X

Cite:
Hаsanov Elnur Latif oglu (2024). Significance of the written sources in study of medieval heritage of Ganja. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (1) 116-134. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.32.116

References:

1. Hasanov, E.L. (2023). Innovative study of historical heritage of Ganja city based on cultural-literary materials. Manuscript and book heritage of Ukraine, (31), Pp. 271—286. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/rksu.31.271
2. Ahmadov, F.M. (2007). Historical mind of Ganja. Ganja: Elm. 246 p.
3. Ibrayeva, A., Sannikov, D.V., Kadyrov, M.A., Zapevalov, V.N., Hasanov, E.L., and Zuev, V.N. (2018). Importance of the Caspian Countries for the European Union Energy Security. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, vol. 8, no. 3. Pp. 150— 159.
4. Hasanov, E.L. (2022). Innovative significance of research of traditional architectural features of Ganja. TSU-TI — The International Scientific Journal of Humanities. No. 1(1). Pp. 71—74. doi: https://doi.org/10.55804/TSU-ti-1/Hasanov
5. Bodenstedt, F (1872). Mirza Schaffy im Liede und in der Wirklichkeit. In Jg. Daheim (Eds.). Leipzig: Verlag. 257p.
6. Gazhieva, B. (2015). Place of allusion in poetic text structure. Nizami history, 5, 14—19.
7. Nizami, Ganjavi. (1491). Seven Beauties. Moscow: Shiraz. 257p.
8. Nizami, Ganjavi. (1543). Iskandername. Moscow: Shiraz. 241 p.
9. Nizami, Ganjavi. (1543). The Treasury of Mysteries. London: British Library. 375 p.
10. Nizami, Ganjavi. (1648). Khosrov and Shirin. Moscow: Bukhara. 286 p. 11. Ganja branch of Azerbaijan Republic National Archive. F. 20, d. 1, w. 17.
11. Ganja branch of Azerbaijan Republic National Archive. F. 20, d. 1, w. 17.
12. Ellman, M. (2010). The Nest of Modernism: Henry James, Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, and Sigmund Freud. New York: Cambridge University Press, 250 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511780714
13. Head, D. (2009). The Modernist Short Story. A Study in Theory and Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 256 p.
14. Hasanov, E.L. (2017). About research of features of legal culture on the basis of historical literary heritage. Information (Japan). Issue 20, vol. 4. Pp. 2289—2296.
15. Mammadguluzadeh, J. (2004). Works. Baku: Onder, 369 p.
16. Hasanov, E.L. (2022). Innovative research of national wisdom in works of Nizami Ganjavi. International Scientific Journal Theoretical and Applied Science. Issue 01, volume 105, Pp. 475—481. doi: https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2022.01.105.36
17. Letters of James Joyce. (1957). Vol.1. New York: Viking Press, 454 p.
18. Hasanov, E.L. (2018). Applied significance of investigation of handicrafts branches in Ganja city based on innovative technologies (Historical-ethnographic research). Prague: Vědecko vydavatelské centrum "Sociosféra-CZ" (Czech Republic). 110 p. ISBN 978-80-7526-323-0
19. Joyce, J. (1982). Dubliners, A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Moscow: High school, 400 p.
20. Məmmədova, M.N. (2012). Nizami Gəncəvi dilinin leksik üslubu. Baku: Nafta-Press. 386 p.
21. Hasanov, E.L. (2015). To the Question on Research of Craftsmanship Traditions of Ganja of XIX — First Half of XX Centuries. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 6. No. 1. Part S1. Pp. 433—437. doi: https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1s1p433
22. Norris, M. (2003). Suspicious Reading’s of Joyces "Dubliners". Philadelphia: University Pennsylvania Press, 279 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202984
23. Guliyeva, N.M., and Häsänov, E.L. (2014). Die traditionelle Gändschänischen Teppiche von Zeitraum der Aserbaidschanischen Gelehrten und Dichter Mirsä Schäfi Waseh als ethnoanthropologische quelle (XIX Jahrhundert). European Applied Sciences, 2, Pp. 3—5.
24. Azerbaijan archaeology: In 6 vol. (2008). Vol. 6. Baku: Sharg-Garb. 632 p.
25. Poulmarc’h, M., Laneri, N., and Hasanov, E.L. (2019). Innovative approach to the research of ethnographic-archaeological heritage in Ganja based on materials of kurgans. Inter national Scientific Journal Theoretical and Applied Science, Issue 09, vol. 77, part 4. Pp. 341— 345. doi: https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2019.09.77.60
26. Tabeikyna, E.K., Kamalova, G.T., Hasanov, E.L., Dzhumagaliyeva, K.V., and Demeuova, N. K. (2021). The place of intelligentsia in socio-economic development of society: the creative perspective. Creativity Studies. 14 (1). Pp. 235—250. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.13639
27. Hasanov, E.L. (2021). Innovative study of historical-ethnographic and cultural heritage of Ganja city for Renaissance period. International Scientific Journal Theoretical and Applied Science. Issue 02, vol. 94. Pp. 248—254. doi: https://doi.org/10.15863/TAS.2021.02.94.53
28. Zamanov, A. (1979). Friends in Deed. Baku: Writer, 200 p.